I found a refreshing take on the Global Warmings wars in this blog entry at the NY Times. It's written from the imagined perspective of a historian 200 years from looking back at the climate change debate. It's short and doesn't really come down on one side of the issue or the other, but instead focusses on what impact science is having on larger society and vice versa. It really is sharp and biting, and gels together a number of points that I've been feeling in the last few years.
What really disgusts me are the comments. The same-old same-old. "It happening." "It's not." "You're stupid." "Am Not" "Am too!" "Am not!"...
Everything flows, but only the macromolecules are worth the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment