Any way, getting back to the abbreviations, the only difference in the two is whether the copolymer has more than 50% vinyl acetate. If it does, go with the VAE, otherwise stick with the EVA. Strange and rather arbitrary.
I'd love to see someone proposing the similar name change for say, ABS (a terpolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene), constantly renaming it depending on the relative amounts of A, B and S. Whoever would suggest such a system would already be starting in a hole since there typically is more styrene in the material than acrylonitrile or butadiene. But think of the possibilities: we could have 6 options:
- ABS
- ASB
- BAS
- BSA
- SAB
- SBA
EPDM (ethylene, propopylene, diene - don't ask about the M) could also face a name change to PEDM (at least the D is consistently in last place).
Anyone proposing such a crazy scheme would probably be tarred-and-feathered (wood tar of course, since we want to biosource it!) so why do we tolerate it for EVA/VAE? Personally, I prefer EVA - it just rolls off the tongue so much better than VAE.
5 comments:
Lots of good reading here, many thanks! I had been checking on yahoo when I identified your article, I’m going to add your feed to Google Reader, I look forward to additional from you.
It's more about the process... If it is done by emulsion polymerization in aqueous media, often with < 50 % Ethylene it is VAE. It is offerd as aqueous dispersion. If it is bulk or solution polymerization for ethylene with some VA, than it becomes EVA, offered as solid polymer...
What is the difference between ABS and EVA?
ABS stands for acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene, while EVA stands for ethylene, and vinyl acetate. They really have nothing in common.
How improve melt flow rate in Eva
Post a Comment