The capillary forces between the different particle shape is different and that difference is enough to totally change the outcome of the drying pattern. The authors suggest in the article that surface roughness may induce strong capillary effects and these results could be relevant to ink jet printing, which I can certainly see as being an issue (a more uniformly drying drop would result in a better image), but getting back to the idea of surface roughness had me thinking another thought: painting, as in painting the walls of your house.
If you ever undertake repainting the walls of your house, you'll find that flat (matte) paints are much easier to work with. As you move from section to section, you don't need to be overly concerned about keeping the edge of the paint wet - my wife and I have stopped for long periods of time in the middle of a wall and started right up again without any issues and trust me, she is plenty picky about these issues. In the same vein, touching up the paint, even months or years later is easy. But as you go to increasingly glossier finishes (eggshell to satin to gloss), these issues become much larger - we've tried glossy paint once and will never do it again, despite the fantastic scrubability. You could easily see how each section of the wall was divided up as we move along, and I suspect that it is probably for a reason related to this research - the particles in the glossy paint favor a ring formation type mechanism is seen in coffee.
So my question is this: Could the use of modified particle shapes in paint be useful in creating glossier paints that won't show how the wall was sectioned off? The challenge of course, will be changing particle shapes without monkeying with the other rheological aspects of the paint.

Yunker, P., Still, T., Lohr, M., & Yodh, A. (2011). Suppression of the coffee-ring effect by shape-dependent capillary interactions Nature, 476 (7360), 308-311 DOI: 10.1038/nature10344
No comments:
Post a Comment