It's a simple enough question raised by a new research article (European Polymer Journal ($)): "What is the glass transition temperature of PTFE"?, but like so many measurements of PTFE, the answer always starts with "it's complicated".
Given all that, plus making measurements of the glass transition, which by itself is already a heated subject, the title are guarantees you a head-scratcher. You may come up with an answer, but it will be quickly followed by "it's complicated".
Being a very simple macromolecule, PTFE crystallizes, so it may seem odd that PTFE shows a glass transition at all, as the transition is normally associated with amorphous materials. However, as is the case with all crystalline polymers, any given non-microscopic sample is only semi-crystalline. Because of the chain lengths and entanglements that arise from them, it is impossible for the polymer to completely crystallize. As a result, there is a significant amount of amorphous material trapped in the sample and this material is what exhibits the glass transition.
This is all a little too much hand-waving for me. This is just a souped-up version of the fringed micelle explanation for polymer crystallization, something we seen discussed here before. The boundary between the mobile and rigid phases is visually clear in this drawing, but how can that be objectively stated?
Ultimately I do feel that the γ-transition is the glass transition for a number of subjective reasons (the temperature range, and that is it below the crystalline transitions), but the explanation of it is still beyond our current understanding, and I certainly don't buy what is being sold here. So what is the mysterious α-transition? Well, it's complicated...
 Teflon is actually the Trademark from Dupont for their PTFE. Other companies have their own trademarks for their own PTFE.
 327 oC, but take that with a grain of salt. Even molten, PTFE doesn't flow like normal polymers, and adding more heat only degrades it that much faster. It's not surprising that LinkedIn had a recent discussion on whether PTFE is a thermoplastic or a thermoset. "Melting" PTFE is not like melting most other polymers.
 A fluid will wet a surface if it has a lower surface energy than the surface. PTFE has the lowest surface energies of all polymers (~ 19 dynes/cm2), while the metals of the fry pan are hundreds if not thousands of dynes/cm2. In other words, the PTFE can't help but stick to the metal. That also explains why nothing else sticks to the PTFE - practically anything else has a higher surface energy. (There is more to adhesion than just wettability, but that is a critical starting point - no wetting, no adhesion.)