Chemical and Engineering News is celebrating the International Year of Crystallography in part by taking submissions from readers of their favorite crystal structures. They have quite a list going and somewhere buried in there is mine:
X-ray diffraction showed that the polymer chains in these crystals were oriented perpendicular to the surface - they are coming out towards the viewer and and are not running along the viewing plane. But the bigger question here is how thick the crystals are. And that can be differed from the the size of the shadows on the photograph. In order to more clearly observe the crystals, they had been coated with a thin layer of metal coming from a source laterally offset from the crystals. Because of the geometric constraints, some portions of the samples were shadowed from the stream of metal atoms. The size of these shadows then allowed for a quick and easy calculation of what the crystals thicknesses were.
And that is where the whole world shifted. The thickness of the crystals was just a fraction of what it should have been if the polymers really had crystallized as "spaghetti in a box". Since the chains were oriented perpendicular to the surface, the only conclusion possible was that the chains were folded back and forth. "Spaghetti in a box" became "ramen in a bag" [*]
[*] "Ramen in a bag"? I just came up with that. It's weird, but the more I think about it, the more I like it.