I was immediately critical of the whole publication as were others. It'd be nice to think that my comments played a role in this investigation, but if they did, they would be just a small part of the picture. There are other fish to fry here. Eyewitnesses of the testing have reported
"...there is a significant mismatch between what is described in the paper and how the experiments were actually performed. Examples include:Yikes! If verified, it looks like this paper is head for Davey Jones' Locker.
• The exposure times of eggs and larvae reported in the paper are longer than the actual duration of the experiment at the Ar research station in Gotland, Sweden.
• The actual number of replicate tanks and fish is lower than what is stated in the paper.
• Aquaria maintenance and monitoring were not conducted as described in the paper"
The presentation seems really easy, but I don't think I'll ever understand this problem. I think it's too complicated and spacious for me. I'm looking forward to your next post, and I'll find out how to do it!
This is really helpful post and very informative there is no doubt about it. 바카라사이트
Post a Comment